1997-11-25 - PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable?
Header Data
From: goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 85023eedf76aedad29ca38797d3d4e176ac9ca8c199021fc75e689698223e7f1
Message ID: <19971125.060408.8463.10.goddesshera@juno.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-25 13:11:49 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:11:49 +0800
Raw message
From: goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:11:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? -- is it usable?
Message-ID: <19971125.060408.8463.10.goddesshera@juno.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Do you think that it is a good idea to migrate from pgp 2.6.3 to
pgp 5.0 now?
This message was automatically remailed. The sender is unknown, unlogged,
and nonreplyable. Send complaints and blocking requests to
<goddesshera@juno.com>.
Thread
- Return to November 1997
Return to December 1997
- Return to “goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)”
- Return to “lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)”
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”
- 1997-11-25 (Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:11:49 +0800) - PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - goddesshera@juno.com (Anonymous Remailer)
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 05:37:06 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
- 1997-12-02 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 01:52:04 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 05:37:06 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
- 1997-11-28 (Sat, 29 Nov 1997 01:17:03 +0800) - Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? – is it usable? - lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)