1997-11-09 - Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users

Header Data

From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: iang@systemics.com (Ian Grigg)
Message Hash: e99f74b092562f9afc4867a1ea2bc98fd58d5d29f10858652766f97407fdb385
Message ID: <m0xUKDq-0003bQC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <3463E8AC.3F54BC7E@systemics.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-09 00:33:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 08:33:18 +0800

Raw message

From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 08:33:18 +0800
To: iang@systemics.com (Ian Grigg)
Subject: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
In-Reply-To: <3463E8AC.3F54BC7E@systemics.com>
Message-ID: <m0xUKDq-0003bQC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> > 20 % of the users who have posted digitally signed messages that are
> >  available in my news spool (international and local newsgroups and
> >  mailing lists) use PGP 5.  The sample contains 545 unique e-mail
> >  addresses.  YMMV.
> 
> These are very interesting results.  One question: what are the groups
> about?  Are they close in to PGP topics or far away?

A number of them are crypto related, including the OpenPGP and a
German PGP users' mailing list.  Perhaps someone with access to a
large newsserver could grep for PGP signatures on the rec.* hierarchy?






Thread