1997-11-18 - Re: [cpe:4545] Mission:Critical and Informal Fallacies

Header Data

From: TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: ea55a617396290047959a206dc139b28564d9bd8ec612e2e7fd21d82cfda6aa7
Message ID: <3470F3FD.321D@dev.null>
Reply To: <v0400277bb0967c576ccc@[139.167.130.248]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-18 02:00:21 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 10:00:21 +0800

Raw message

From: TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 10:00:21 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: [cpe:4545] Mission:Critical and Informal Fallacies
In-Reply-To: <v0400277bb0967c576ccc@[139.167.130.248]>
Message-ID: <3470F3FD.321D@dev.null>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Robert Hettinga wrote:
>  Notice
> that argumentum ad hominem is when you discount someone's opinion because
> of who they are or what they do. Vuperative insults, it seems, are another
> thing altogether.  :-).

  Right... Like we're going to believe this when communist pedophile 
Nazi cocksucker Robert Hettinga tells it to us.
  I bet that when I look up 'vuperative' in the dictionary, he'll be
wrong about that, too.

AdHomineMonger






Thread