1997-11-19 - ITAR

Header Data

From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <mix@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: ff9fd97a6c1178b1d75ce9746eec15bad519703452212e95caf6905e91f07c8a
Message ID: <19971119010002.15815.qmail@nym.alias.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-19 01:07:25 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:07:25 +0800

Raw message

From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <mix@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:07:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: ITAR
Message-ID: <19971119010002.15815.qmail@nym.alias.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



If someone writes a piece of software, a networking layer, or anything else
with support for later cryptographic enhancement but doesn't actually
include the cryptographic implementation and it is later added by somebody
outside of the United States does this fall under ITAR? 

In other words the original U.S. authors wrote the software with support for
crypto, function hooks, etc. They didn't include any crypto at all. Somebody
outside the United States uses these hooks and writes strong cryptography.
These modifications are kept as patches and never exported from the U.S.. Is
this allowed? What if the U.S. authors are actively collaborating with the
non-US authors?






Thread