1997-12-16 - Re: Identity, Persistence, Anonymity, and Accountability–Part I of II
Header Data
From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Message Hash: 1540ba41679fe39c13708f14bfd499f112bcd2913c82c1c343f822d82ef7618d
Message ID: <v03102804b0bbcd923f55@[208.129.55.202]>
Reply To: <199712160027.TAA08624@mx01.together.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-16 20:33:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 04:33:38 +0800
Raw message
From: Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 04:33:38 +0800
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: Identity, Persistence, Anonymity, and Accountability--Part I of II
In-Reply-To: <199712160027.TAA08624@mx01.together.net>
Message-ID: <v03102804b0bbcd923f55@[208.129.55.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 8:13 PM -0800 12/15/1997, Greg Broiles wrote:
>There's an important distinction between a requirement that you identify
>yourself accurately, and a requirement that you carry a particular form of
>identification. It is constitutional for the police to ask you what your
>name is, under certain circumstances - and you can face criminal charges if
>you lie.
If you refuse to identify yourself to LE, how long can you be held (assuming their data base check turns up nothing.)
--Steve
Thread
Return to December 1997
- Return to ““Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>”
- Return to “Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>”
Return to “Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>”
- 1997-12-16 (Tue, 16 Dec 1997 08:40:54 +0800) - Re: Identity, Persistence, Anonymity, and Accountability–Part I of II - “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
- 1997-12-16 (Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:16:49 +0800) - Re: Identity, Persistence, Anonymity, and Accountability–Part I of II - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
- 1997-12-16 (Wed, 17 Dec 1997 04:33:38 +0800) - Re: Identity, Persistence, Anonymity, and Accountability–Part I of II - Steve Schear <schear@lvdi.net>