cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-12-07 - Re: Singapore

Header Data

From: Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
To: hallam@ai.mit.edu (Phillip M. Hallam-Baker)
Message Hash: 193248ae896d06f765e8efa2f07628454c7c252bae919e5c0755814e072fc3f4
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971207114051.034b4498@dnai.com>
Reply To: <01bd026d$85c8c4a0$06060606@russell>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-07 23:51:42 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 07:51:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 07:51:42 +0800
To: hallam@ai.mit.edu (Phillip M. Hallam-Baker)
Subject: Re: Singapore
In-Reply-To: <01bd026d$85c8c4a0$06060606@russell>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971207114051.034b4498@dnai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 05:07 PM 12/7/97 +0800, Harish Pillay wrote:
>I did come across some ill-informed post (not by Phillip though :-)) 
that 
>said that there are national filters to Internet access here.  Well, 
indeed,
>the top level ISPs here have choosen to use filtering proxy servers 
to filter 
                              ^^^^^^^^
>out an alleged list of 100 porno sites (you can see that there is an 
on going 
>URL hunt to discover these filtered sites on 
>www.sintercom.org/hunt/rahunt.html.  

And if any of those ISP's "chose" not to engage in such filtering, 
how long would they be permitted to stay in business?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNIr7wjKf8mIpTvjWEQLwWgCgx10JTQ0HL3oHqnbOtgSNqkGmhbIAoLiw
yQW0aSbt7jFdSa4a5exAobyW
=JC1J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread