1997-12-16 - Re: A gauntlet thrown down by PC-Magic?

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: abdiel@worldnet.att.net (Alex Woolfson)
Message Hash: 4d04f50790ddef2827357cac093f2eb796e68a639ed8caf8818841515619f3b3
Message ID: <199712161415.JAA29894@homeport.org>
Reply To: <000401bd09f8$f4615200$07a1400c@default>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-16 14:26:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 22:26:25 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 22:26:25 +0800
To: abdiel@worldnet.att.net (Alex Woolfson)
Subject: Re: A gauntlet thrown down by PC-Magic?
In-Reply-To: <000401bd09f8$f4615200$07a1400c@default>
Message-ID: <199712161415.JAA29894@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





Alex Woolfson wrote:
| Just FYI here is the response I got from PC-Magic.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Scott Chaney <scott@pc-magic.com>
| To: Alex Woolfson <abdiel@worldnet.att.net>
| Date: Monday, December 15, 1997 4:02 PM
| Subject: Re: Encrypted Magic Folders

| >Thanks for the feedback.  We are considering an established standard.
| >
| >BTW, for all the "crap" we get from supposed crypto experts no one has
| >come close to breaking our method.  It does make for humorous reading
| >tho.

| Anyone care to take him up on his challenge?  Please say yes.  :-)

	No.

	We need to educate the public that this is not an acceptable
answer, not provide free cryptanalysis to every company that comes
along.

	It took 3 years to break knapsack.  The week before it
happened, no one had come close.  That was not a good reason to be
using it.

Adam




-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread