1997-12-04 - Unbreakable Encryption / Re: Superdistribution development/release

Header Data

From: TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 5670f386d78ff251382a9464843517624617f7ae249a41d8675853201b72fa7d
Message ID: <34862332.4D32@dev.null>
Reply To: <v03007800b0abc492abcc@[168.161.105.216]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-04 03:35:35 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 11:35:35 +0800

Raw message

From: TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 11:35:35 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Unbreakable Encryption / Re: Superdistribution development/release
In-Reply-To: <v03007800b0abc492abcc@[168.161.105.216]>
Message-ID: <34862332.4D32@dev.null>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh wrote:
> 
> Here an incentive: if anyone breaks this, I'll write an article about it
> and another profiling the person who does.
> 
> When you have this kind of "encryption" scheme running on untrusted
> hardware to which the user has access, it's doomed to fail. Even if it's
> custom hardware, it'll probably be broken, but it'll just take longer.

  I-ay et-bay ou-yay an't-cay eak-bray is-thay essage-may.

  For a limited time (ACT NOW!) I am offering shares in my new
encryption ompany-cay that has developed an unbreakable new
pig-latin technology.
  Rumors that I acquired this technology by buying out DataETRetch
are completely unfounded.

Uth-trayOnger-May






Thread