1997-12-19 - Re: Is Unix dying–or even dead?

Header Data

From: phelix@vallnet.com
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 6cc98debcbe1d2c4a102a5ce6c85a362fd17f38b4ed4e8f15b0807aa3f7812b2
Message ID: <349a62b8.37418915@128.2.84.191>
Reply To: <199712190745.JAA17166@ankara.duzen.com.tr>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-19 12:19:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 20:19:09 +0800

Raw message

From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 20:19:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Is Unix dying--or even dead?
In-Reply-To: <199712190745.JAA17166@ankara.duzen.com.tr>
Message-ID: <349a62b8.37418915@128.2.84.191>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 19 Dec 1997 05:59:43 -0600, "S. M. Halloran" <mitch@duzen.com.tr> wrote:

>
>>From Edupage, 18 December 1997:
>
><---------->
>TACTICAL SHIFT BY WORKSTATION COMPANIES
>Silicon Graphics Inc.'s plan to allow SGI graphics software to run on
>Microsoft's Windows NT operating system provides new evidence that a
>growing number of companies are giving up on Unix and instead
>standardizing on Windows NT.  SGI hopes to be able to use its
>experience in developing high-end graphics software without having to
>spend a great deal of time building the underlying technology
>represented by an operating system. (Washington Post  17 Dec 97)
><---------->

Does this mean that Unix is dying?
No, it means that graphics professionals are buying Wintel boxes instead of
SGI's expensive workstations. ( a shame really, SGI make some damn nice
workstations, but that pesky price/performance ratio is pushing people into
high end Wintel boxes)

-- Phelix







Thread