1997-12-03 - Re: Pasting in From:

Header Data

From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: 945a1f45750a161ec23f9918625d38bba77165082ecaf3b6a1cd1503865b2a89
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.971203145414.558C-100000@shirley>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971130202253.007595d8@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-03 05:42:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 13:42:58 +0800

Raw message

From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 13:42:58 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Pasting in From:
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971130202253.007595d8@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.971203145414.558C-100000@shirley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun, 30 Nov 1997, Bill Stewart wrote:

[...]

> So if the remailers don't support From: pasting, it's no loss.
> Similarly, for Reply-To: and Sender: and Path: and Received:
> and maybe a few other occasionally-forged header fields.

There is a good reson to allow peaple to stick there a 'Reply-To:' in.
This permits replies to be directed to some sort of anon post office box
or other such mechanisum.

- -- 
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep.  ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett.  I do not reply to munged addresses.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNITYaqQK0ynCmdStAQFYhAQA4VuRr3mpzG+SJ4rNC5bIz9hcMQOLfSsi
2iKRBEvwGEOBb6hak76J8m9y7IuFTDGC68AjwKRNjzNEOZLYzH+BuBXYzggCqmBg
j0nYmYpGBRcO9+saDnzIBwHJQ5mwixmRdEnzdN7TfL52xzLjaoN21dm0sJFefHgw
DIE9JO6A9sk=
=OQwG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread