1997-12-04 - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)

Header Data

From: Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
To: James Love <declan@pathfinder.com>
Message Hash: 9c950e745f7ddd739f302df1e9dd44ccb1a27bb37031d4aa8e82b88698dbb32e
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971203170222.03484d78@dnai.com>
Reply To: <v0300780cb0ab2a8bef6c@[204.254.21.129]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-04 01:39:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:39:34 +0800

Raw message

From: Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:39:34 +0800
To: James Love <declan@pathfinder.com>
Subject: Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)
In-Reply-To: <v0300780cb0ab2a8bef6c@[204.254.21.129]>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971203170222.03484d78@dnai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 05:05 PM 12/3/97 -0500, James Love wrote:
>Declan, apparently having missed the fab 50's, seems to be enjoying 
his
>use of the "leftist" word lately.  Since this seems to mean quite
>different things to different persons, perhaps Mr. McCullagh can 
define
>his terms.  What exactly is a "leftist" in 1997, in his opinion?

When the leftists try to avoid being called 'leftists', you know it's 
all over but the mopping up. 

But, nonetheless, let me try:
"A leftist is someone who advocates increasing government control 
over private actions, especially in the name of such mummeries as 
'equality' and 'fairness'. Contrast to a rightist, who advocates 
increasing government control over private action in the name of 
'decency' and 'values'."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNIYBHTKf8mIpTvjWEQL5SwCfa54X344lCmYy25teJGCRUp1QfIUAn3F1
4d9HjdglfH+c0NJZ9+jmyw+6
=LXws
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread