1997-12-02 - Re: PGP bought by McAfee

Header Data

From: phelix@vallnet.com
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: ea92e5d72d2b9411dd9e9170529b77ec3d3b305324a0268018c4f7f6375275d1
Message ID: <348482a8.17218254@128.2.84.191>
Reply To: <348356EF.21C4@ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-02 03:54:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:54:19 +0800

Raw message

From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 11:54:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: PGP bought by McAfee
In-Reply-To: <348356EF.21C4@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <348482a8.17218254@128.2.84.191>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 1 Dec 1997 21:30:35 -0600, steve <xxxxxx@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>
>>"Network Associates, Inc.
>>(Nasdaq: NETA, commencing Dec. 2), formerly McAfee Associates
>>(Nasdaq: MCAF), announced today that it has a signed a definitive
>>agreement to acquire privately-held Pretty Good Privacy, Inc. (PGP)."
>
>Varous Questions, comments rants, etc.:
>
>Does anyone know how this will affect PGP's:
>security, commitment to no-GAK, Founder (P. Zimmerman), the continuation
>of the PGP product line?
>
>I heard that McAfee's PCCrypto product will still be sold by NETA as a
>retail product, (are they considering 
>incorperating the 2 together and just using PGP's team for R&D?)
>
>steve

Even more basic questions:  Will NETA release source code?  Will they
continue to develop freeware versions of PGP?  What conections does NETA
have to S/MIME?  What happens to licensing of things like PGPsdk and the
freeware versions of PGP?  Will PGP be seen as a "dead-end" product by
potential new users.  What will happen to Open-PGP email encryption
standard?

This is not good.

-- Phelix






Thread