From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 11:48:14 +0800
To: "James A. Donald" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: The name "Crypto Kong"
In-Reply-To: <199801101918.LAA06148@proxy4.ba.best.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980110194009.00883460@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:18 AM 1/10/98 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
>I have received some negative feedback about the name 
>"Crypto Kong".
>Two people have complained that it is unprofessional sounding. 

Keep it.  If you're going for the liberal non-techie market, it's good;
if you're going for the financial market it's still ok,
and if you need to, you can publish a standard for it,
and some small Nevada corporation with a boring name can distribute a 
Crypto-Kong-compatible product with a boring name for you :-)

				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639