1998-01-05 - Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe?

Header Data

From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 595f0c54d351f0ce436177a276be34669f7204594579e7d6732d33553d78e0fc
Message ID: <v03102807b0d63ed803b9@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <19980105070034.3946.qmail@hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-05 07:51:22 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 15:51:22 +0800

Raw message

From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 15:51:22 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is FEAL developed by NTT safe?
In-Reply-To: <19980105070034.3946.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <v03102807b0d63ed803b9@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:00 PM -0800 1/4/98, Nobuki Nakatuji wrote:
>Is FEAL developed by NTT safe? Where isn't safe if it is here because it
>isn't safe?
>

FEAL am not safe if not safe here.

(Try using a search engine or Schneier, Nobuki Nakatuji, to answer these
stupid little Zen koans you keep hitting us with.)

--Tim May

The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221   | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."








Thread