From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 12:41:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Gore Commission wants to regulate the Net like broadcast
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980120163439.4246A-100000@vorlon.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <v0311075fb0ec7aa78162@[207.94.249.133]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 12:30 PM -0800 1/21/98, Tim May wrote:
>At 1:34 PM -0800 1/20/98, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 16:20:23 -0500
>>From: Alan Moseley <amoseley@clark.net>
>>To: declan@well.com
>>Subject: the Gore Commission and digital media
>>
>>The Gore Commission -- the group created by Clinton to determine the
>>future public interest obligations of digital TV broadcasters -- showed
>>signs last week of broadening its reach to include other digital media
>>that can deliver broadcast-like audio and video.
>>...
>>	The recent experience of the Communications Decency Act
>>demonstrates the government's willingness to control digital speech.  The
                                //eagerness
>>digital convergence argument could be a  new rationale for further such
>>interventions, Maines warned.
>
>Just because the Internet can deliver audio and video signals is hardly a
>matter of "allocating scarce resources." Video rental stores can also
>deliver video signals, but there is no (well, modulo the "obscenity" laws
>in various communities) regulation of these sources.

Presumably they intend to also regulate live theater.  It can also deliver
audio and video.  FUBAR.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       |                            | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | All politicians should ski.| 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com |                            | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA