1998-01-08 - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality

Header Data

From: David Miller <dm0@avana.net>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 9472acc8140defcf79272ad7fb4125e580bb4b772b1dd5298bbe4fc9e58b8a93
Message ID: <34B560A2.2F2C@avana.net>
Reply To: <md5:2F4707F94158BBCDE58F1FC30140DD96>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-08 21:30:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 05:30:27 +0800

Raw message

From: David Miller <dm0@avana.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 05:30:27 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality
In-Reply-To: <md5:2F4707F94158BBCDE58F1FC30140DD96>
Message-ID: <34B560A2.2F2C@avana.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May wrote:

> Consider Andrew Wiles, Princeton math professor, and the prover of Fermat's
> Last Theorem. He labored in secrecy for many years, only going public when
> he felt his results were complete. (As it turned out, they were not, and he
> needed another year or two to fill in some gaps.)

You may have seen the same TV show I saw on him.  I really enjoyed it.

Is there any evidence that he got (ahem) outside funding for his project?
In the back of my paranoid mind, I wondered that since he was dealing with
elliptic curves and modular arithmetic if...  I mean, how did he pay his
mortgage?  The show implied that he was not doing any real teaching most
of that time, and if no one at the school knew of his work, then where was
the money coming from?

--David Miller






Thread