1998-01-11 - Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd)

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 991bcdf6e4e12d74d666aa0840484377193fe6c86ee7610641c92cb3caebc179
Message ID: <LLe6ie65w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <34B85EED.2D12492D@avana.net>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-11 16:08:40 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:08:40 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:08:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <34B85EED.2D12492D@avana.net>
Message-ID: <LLe6ie65w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



David Miller <dm0@avana.net> writes:

> > ... If an art critic declines
> > to publish something, its a loss probably only to his fellow art critics,
> > but if a mathematician or a biologist or a physicist doesn't publish, it's
> > a loss for more than just his colleagues.
>
> The author has a skewed view which says that science is more important
> than
> art.  Simply not true.  Don't get too narrow a view of "progress".

David, you need to learn to read.

"Art critic" != art, just like "lit crit" != literature.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread