1998-01-16 - Re: Legality of faxed signatures.

Header Data

From: “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
To: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
Message Hash: f8a9d6e79bc473b8005c4a7abb94ae776b607b513511607bf59c1040b4ecdae4
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19980116175450.0312afd4@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Reply To: <199801162156.NAA01504@proxy3.ba.best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-01-16 23:09:47 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 07:09:47 +0800

Raw message

From: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 07:09:47 +0800
To: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Subject: Re: Legality of faxed signatures.
In-Reply-To: <199801162156.NAA01504@proxy3.ba.best.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19980116175450.0312afd4@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 01:56 PM 1/16/98 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
>This is a big problem for me, because I want to scare
>businessmen into using digital signatures.  

Part of the process for having a Digital Signature law is to establish the
definition of a writing.  Since faxes are not writings, but email is, you
should be able to scare them into digital signatures pretty easily.


  -- Robert Costner                  Phone: (770) 512-8746
     Electronic Frontiers Georgia    mailto:pooh@efga.org  
     http://www.efga.org/            run PGP 5.0 for my public key






Thread