1998-02-06 - Re: Feds Approve Bank to Certify Digital Signatures

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: bill.stewart@pobox.com
Message Hash: 6fc7a75de01eef43ea9f182970b11116a6766bc6b9ae868ea7d3e5f4a02df77b
Message ID: <199802061333.IAA22492@homeport.org>
Reply To: <199802051901.LAA19858@comsec.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-06 13:44:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:44:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:44:18 +0800
To: bill.stewart@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Feds Approve Bank to Certify Digital Signatures
In-Reply-To: <199802051901.LAA19858@comsec.com>
Message-ID: <199802061333.IAA22492@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I'm not sure it is unfortunate that they'll be offering escrow.  If
its a complete flop, then we'll be able to point to the complete
failure of the released system.

Time for some Big Brother inside stickers to be printed out, slapped
on flyers for the program, and remailing to potential customers. :)

Anyone work at ZNB?  Want help quitting?

Adam


Bill Stewart wrote:
| There was a note to Dave Farber's list that the Office of the 
| Comptroller of Currency has approved Zion's First National Bank
| to certify digital signatures.  Since they're in Utah, Zion's has
| 
| They're going to offer digital signature certificates
| with the usual binding of a key to a body plus papers,
| and provide software to support it.  Some of their software
| can be used for encryption, and unfortunately they're
| going to offer key escrow, though as a separate business
| service, with keys encrypted by the key's corporate owner
| as well as by the bank for protection, but it's not
| going to be a mandatory service, and they have no intention
| of offering escrow for signature keys, only encryption keys.


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread