1998-02-26 - Re: DES search

Header Data

From: andrew fabbro <afabbro@umich.edu>
To: “Dr. Alan Sherman” <sherman@cs.umbc.edu>
Message Hash: 76298435659008fc13d93fec80eeda5e05ccab6b540839bc84166d801b50c03c
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980226143809.3553E-100000@brokenarrow.us.itd.umich.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.980226132743.23307C-100000@topdog.cs.umbc.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-26 21:02:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:02:21 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: andrew fabbro <afabbro@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:02:21 -0800 (PST)
To: "Dr. Alan Sherman" <sherman@cs.umbc.edu>
Subject: Re: DES search
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.980226132743.23307C-100000@topdog.cs.umbc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980226143809.3553E-100000@brokenarrow.us.itd.umich.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Dr. Alan Sherman wrote:

> Why doesn't someone speed up the DES search with Hellman's
> time-space tradeoff, whose precomputation could be done within
> a month?

Probably because finding spare CPU cycles on thousands of machines is
easy and free, while finding the disk storage space that you mention
would be expensive, and I doubt distributed.net has the resources.
And people who do have the resources are busy doing other things with
them, or keep them at Fort Meade.

I forget because I haven't read that part of Applied Crypto in a while,
but wasn't it terabytes of storage?

-- 
 Andrew Fabbro [afabbro@umich.edu] [andrewf@jesuswept.com]
 http://www-personal.umich.edu/~afabbro/      313.647.2713 
   "When in Bologna will a Fabbro rise again?" --Dante






Thread