From: Ken Williams <jkwilli2@unity.ncsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:31:07 +0800
To: Alan Tu <ATU5713@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: What's the latest in factoring?
In-Reply-To: <199802072222_MC2-3262-79F5@compuserve.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980209031217.29748A-100000@c00069-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sat, 7 Feb 1998, Alan Tu wrote:

>anything more recent?  Also, whereas 1024 bits was the commonly accepted
>threshhold for key lengths more than two years ago, what's the threshhold
>now?  Because I have DOS (and like it) I use PGP 2.63ix, when should I
>retire my 1024-bit key?  I don't expect anybody to answer that I should
>do so immediately, but can someone give me an idea on what people are
>doing in regard to key length?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Alan Tu

8192 bits is used now.  you can generate 8192 bit keys with PGP 2.6.3ui
(the unofficial international version).

check out "PGP Projects" at http://www.westfalen.de/hugo/pgp/
or "The Unofficial International PGP Home Page" at
http://members.tripod.com/~Crompton/pgp.htm
for info and download.

[note:  you can of course generate MUCH larger keys, but i'm attempting to
be practical for a change]

Regards,

TATTOOMAN 

/-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[   TATTOOMAN   ]-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\  
| NC State Computer Science Dept   VP of The  E. H. A. P. Corp. |
| jkwilli2@adm.csc.ncsu.edu        http://www.hackers.com/ehap/ |
| jkwilli2@unity.ncsu.edu          ehap@hackers.com             |
| WWW---[   http://152.7.11.38/~tattooman/                      |
| FTP---[   ftp://152.7.11.38/pub/personal/tattooman/           | 
| WW2---[   http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jkwilli2/                     |                           
| W3B---[   http://152.7.11.38/~tattooman/w3board/              |
| PGP---[   http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jkwilli2/pgp.asc              |
|       35 E1 32 C7 C9 EF A0 AB  9D FE 8E FC 2D 68 55 44        |
\-=-=-=-=-=-=-[   http://152.7.11.38/~tattooman/  ]-=-=-=-=-=-=-/