1998-02-10 - What Jim Choate doesn’t know

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 8328931d466e809b7247cb0b00acf289d3eabe061e243d9fe5cb724a4c34d4df
Message ID: <199802100200.DAA04492@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-02-10 02:18:37 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:18:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 10:18:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: What Jim Choate doesn't know
Message-ID: <199802100200.DAA04492@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



When Jim Choate writes about something that I know about, he is usually
wrong.  Look at the hash he made of quantum mechanics recently.  And don't
get me started on his blunders regarding cryptography.

So when he writes about something I don't know about, like the EM
emissions of video tubes, I tend to assume the same thing.  He's probably
all messed up.

Anybody else have the same experience?

And how about his countless off-topic posts, forwarding all kinds of
pointless crap?  Is anyone else sick of that, too?






Thread