1998-03-21 - Re: Complaints about spam are TRUE theft of services

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
To: “Ross Wright” <ian@deepwell.com>
Message Hash: 0a508ff8c17ef5107671c453696e1f04e9d5cd52b3cc3fb15ea3d0925002a73c
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980320234658.0090d5f0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199803202326.PAA09734@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-03-21 08:05:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 00:05:45 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 00:05:45 -0800 (PST)
To: "Ross Wright" <ian@deepwell.com>
Subject: Re: Complaints about spam are TRUE theft of services
In-Reply-To: <199803202326.PAA09734@toad.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980320234658.0090d5f0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:27 PM 3/20/98 -0700, Ross Wright wrote:
>No, actually your complaints about spam are TRUE theft of services. 

If you're a spammer, you're in no position to complain.

>[Anecdotes about somebody receiving more complaints about spam
than actual spam.]

Complaints about spam are free speech, and by encouraging Internet providers
to increase the size of their networks, they're obviously commerce :-)

Anecdotes are just anecdotes; except during the occasional flame war about spam, 
I generally receive a lot more spam than complaints.  And at least the 
complaints have some creative thought behind them, unlike the spam...
				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639





Thread