1998-07-08 - Re: Junger et al.

Header Data

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
To: cryptography@c2.net
Message Hash: 25db67ada2aebb6043d505f4f459ef78413908608e9b6e77539875074ade35e4
Message ID: <35A32D1C.C9CE9598@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply To: <199807071841.UAA18158@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-07-08 08:26:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 01:26:34 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 01:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: cryptography@c2.net
Subject: Re: Junger et al.
In-Reply-To: <199807071841.UAA18158@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <35A32D1C.C9CE9598@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Anonymous wrote:

> Does it matter who might 'read' the material, in regards to the protection
> of free speech? Whether it is written so that Russians or computers might
> be able to read it? If source code is written on a napkin, it can be
> currently exported, but what if tomorrow a vendor announces a 'napkin
> computer' which can directly read from napkins akin to a super-low densiy
> floppy disc.

Put the source code on a neuro-disk and you can export it under
any crypto law that can ever be invented till eternity.

M. K. Shen





Thread