1998-07-07 - Re: IP: “CyberCash can’t oust credit cards”

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: “Arnold G. Reinhold” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e2b2c629d3b03136f909ee2d6f3992bb71aacea5b640c189fc65b008aae80c95
Message ID: <v04011730b1c7e1f43186@[139.167.130.246]>
Reply To: <v0401170bb1c67c2a2ef8@[139.167.130.246]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-07-07 14:40:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 07:40:04 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 07:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IP: "CyberCash can't oust credit cards"
In-Reply-To: <v0401170bb1c67c2a2ef8@[139.167.130.246]>
Message-ID: <v04011730b1c7e1f43186@[139.167.130.246]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 8:47 AM -0400 on 7/7/98, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote:



> Three orders of magnitude cost reduction as compared to what?  I can
> believe that much improvement over running my credit card thru an imprinter
> and processing the paper slip.

Yes. SSL and HTML does that to paper, even telephone, credit card
transactions. As long as you're using the net anyway. :-).

> But I doubt you can get anything like1000X
> over SET, ugly as it is.

Actually, it's *SET's* burden to proove that it's 1000X cheaper (including
the cost of fraud) than SSL, the status quo ante of internet payment
systems.

I don't think SET is cheaper, much less three orders of magnitude cheaper,
than SSL.

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga
-----------------
Robert A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@philodox.com>
Philodox Financial Technology Evangelism <http://www.philodox.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The Philodox Symposium on Digital Bearer Transaction Settlement
  July 23-24, 1998: <http://www.philodox.com/symposiuminfo.html>





Thread