1998-08-26 - Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?

Header Data

From: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@nis.acs.uci.edu>
To: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@openpgp.net>
Message Hash: 3c1997fd8f167ce7ea3031d9f02126e80665c209e963bffd7e9145971974d527
Message ID: <35E4652F.66D2@nis.acs.uci.edu>
Reply To: <199808261937.OAA017.62@geiger.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-26 19:49:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:49:11 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@nis.acs.uci.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 12:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@openpgp.net>
Subject: Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?
In-Reply-To: <199808261937.OAA017.62@geiger.com>
Message-ID: <35E4652F.66D2@nis.acs.uci.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


William H. Geiger III wrote:
> >Sad that I wasted this much time responding.
> 
> Why, because I challenge your PC dogma and require to to rationally
> justify it? We have an old saying here "If you are scared son, then say
> you are scared". If you are unable to rationally and objectively justify
> your PC dogma than just say so.

Smirk.  /I'm terrified/  I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.





Thread