1998-08-26 - Re: Is hate code speech?

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 928ff8aab339890eba70e9d2ecd7d88ae9de82d4eba0f33198062cea88bb33cc
Message ID: <199808260334.FAA10228@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-08-26 03:34:11 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:34:11 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is hate code speech?
Message-ID: <199808260334.FAA10228@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Xcott Craver wrote:

> 	On the other hand, only a moron would write source code for
> 	a commercial product without the assumption that other people
> 	will be reading it, and in fact will *have* to read it to get
> 	paid.  Any arguments that the coders didn't intend/expect that
> 	the messages would one day be read by a black person is pretty
> 	weak.

Oh, I don't know. After all, we all know that blacks are so descriminated
against. That's why we "need" such things as quotas, affirmative action,
"dumbing down" of test scores, special versions of standardized tests for
blacks, ebonics, and other such great ideas. Therefore, analyzing the
government party line, it is perfectly reasonable to have assumed that
blacks would always be so descriminated against as to never get hired for
such a position.

Right.








Thread