1998-09-28 - GPL & commercial software, the critical distinction

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: a60d7a1ac84e5571d8c6b8eae6c13a968e032a3736f8d808d687588ef5f957e5
Message ID: <199809282229.RAA03186@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-28 09:27:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 17:27:55 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 17:27:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: GPL & commercial software, the critical distinction
Message-ID: <199809282229.RAA03186@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Hi,

It has been asserted that the use of GNU code within a project causes that
product to be GPL'ed and as a result the GPL is not commercialy viable.

This is an incorrect interpretation.

The GPL does say that if you use GPL'ed code in your project then the
project is GPL'ed, it does NOT say that if you make function calls into a
GPL'ed library that the product is GPL'ed. This distinction makes fully
commercial and source-secure products within the GPL infrastructure possible
and feasible.


    ____________________________________________________________________

                            The seeker is a finder.

                                     Ancient Persian Proverb

       The Armadillo Group       ,::////;::-.          James Choate
       Austin, Tx               /:'///// ``::>/|/      ravage@ssz.com
       www.ssz.com            .',  ||||    `/( e\      512-451-7087
                           -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
    --------------------------------------------------------------------





Thread