1998-09-14 - Re: Clinton’s fake apologies

Header Data

From: Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>
To: raymond@fbn.bc.ca
Message Hash: a6961efd1d60faa1d7f82edd69376752cc3bfa442538336cd62cfe6fd0230304
Message ID: <35FD3C1F.514C@lsil.com>
Reply To: <199809120319.UAA20709@leroy.fbn.bc.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-14 03:05:35 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 11:05:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 11:05:35 +0800
To: raymond@fbn.bc.ca
Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies
In-Reply-To: <199809120319.UAA20709@leroy.fbn.bc.ca>
Message-ID: <35FD3C1F.514C@lsil.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>If the game looks too rough who do you blame?
>
Nice point. 

> I see the whole OIC crusade against Clinton as an attempt to bring
> honesty to government.  Ken Starr is just playing the game by the
> rules set out be the Clintons.  
>
But I guess I can't quite buy into it because I see no first order
differences between the Republocrats and the Demicans. The whole thing
looks to me like a redefinition of the rules of engagement in the same
old power struggle. Hardly Control vs. Kaos.

Mike





Thread