From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 10:08:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Boxer and Fong on encryption
Message-ID: <360E557D.E8C49F00@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



For California types: Barbara Boxer and Matt Fong responding to questions
in today's SJMC news:

  HI-TECH ISSUES

  1. Did the administration's July 7 decision to let software
  companies export encryption software to financial institutions in
  certain counties go far enough toward relaxing the rules on
  encryption exports? Why/why not?

  BOXER: I am a cosponsor of Senator Burns' Pro-CODE legislation,
  which prohibits the Secretary of Commerce from putting any restrictions
  on the export of encrypted items -- regardless of bit or key length. The
  administration's proposal did not go far enough at all.

  FONG: The administration's new policy simply does not go far enough.
  The administration is rightfully worried about national security, but the
  Genie is out of the bottle. While Clinton has stuck to his restrictive
export
  policy on encryption software, foreign encryption products have become
  more sophisticated and more price competitive. US companies should be
  allowed to export encryption software if similar products are already
  available by foreign competitors.

We'd see more contrast with Feinstein's answer.  Too bad <she's> not
running in this race.

-- 
	Jim Gillogly
	Mersday, 6 Winterfilth S.R. 1998, 15:05
	12.19.5.9.19, 3 Cauac 12 Chen, First Lord of Night