1998-10-15 - Re: Who is next? (re Jim’s subpoena)

Header Data

From: orowley@imaginemedia.com (Owen Rowley)
To: “William J. Hartwell” <billh@ibag.com>
Message Hash: 2870d5ca0bafeb353f6c2f56af62aa89e28124df2e1b1015e6bdd9c6d6d9da81
Message ID: <36262FD7.C8BEA9AD@imaginemedia.com>
Reply To: <3.0.5.32.19981015084148.00943940@mail.xroads.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-15 17:47:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 01:47:07 +0800

Raw message

From: orowley@imaginemedia.com (Owen Rowley)
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 01:47:07 +0800
To: "William J. Hartwell" <billh@ibag.com>
Subject: Re: Who is next? (re Jim's subpoena)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981015084148.00943940@mail.xroads.com>
Message-ID: <36262FD7.C8BEA9AD@imaginemedia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




William J. Hartwell wrote:

> This is a poor paraphrase of the original but I wonder if it is something
> that we may be saying here in the U.S. soon?

perhaps the answer is to *NOT BE* in the U.S. when it's being said.

LUX ./. owen

Thread

• Return to October 1998

• Return to “orowley@imaginemedia.com (Owen Rowley)”

• Return to ““William J. Hartwell” <billh@ibag.com>”

• 1998-10-15 (Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:21:54 +0800) - Who is next? (re Jim’s subpoena) - “William J. Hartwell” <billh@ibag.com>
  • 1998-10-15 (Fri, 16 Oct 1998 01:47:07 +0800) - Re: Who is next? (re Jim’s subpoena) - orowley@imaginemedia.com (Owen Rowley)