1998-10-01 - RE: GPL & commercial software, the critical distinction (fwd)

Header Data

From: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
To: “Cypherpunks (E-mail)” <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: 481ebd9e172cc3c3e2ba8a383f41cffe0d5178e482503add350b245b17937863
Message ID: <33CCFE438B9DD01192E800A024C84A1928471F@mossbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-10-01 09:16:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 17:16:07 +0800

Raw message

From: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 17:16:07 +0800
To: "Cypherpunks (E-mail)" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: RE: GPL & commercial software, the critical distinction (fwd)
Message-ID: <33CCFE438B9DD01192E800A024C84A1928471F@mossbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jim Choate wrote:
> I'd say the obvious one, the Unix code tree is more stable 
> than the MS tree.

Sure, but does that mean the MS platform was less suitable than Unix, or
their MS platform programmers were inferior to their Unix counterparts.
I believe Netscape outsourced the Unix development, at least initially.
I would blame insufficient SQA at Netscape, and from what I've heard
that claim is justified.

	Matt





Thread