1998-11-05 - Re: TEMPEST laptops

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 2865cf0da790b7d0dddd30d3e4f9f3fd811dfd49c7bff0467affead6885362d6
Message ID: <199811052109.WAA21423@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-05 21:49:49 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 05:49:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 05:49:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: TEMPEST laptops
Message-ID: <199811052109.WAA21423@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 09:45 PM 11/4/98 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>>The other question is how hard, given a _specific_ machine would it be to
>>create a "RF" jammer? Sort of an active defense versus the passive defense
>>of a Tempest sheild. build a device that measures the RF coming off a

Well dang Tim, if you're gonna work inside a Faraday cage you
may as well run a Tesla coil outside it... 


--Lace Aliens Slide on my Rugs










  








Thread