1998-11-26 - Re: Article V - an analysis

Header Data

From: “Douglas L. Peterson” <fnorky@chisp.net>
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Message Hash: 36a6f28395bd54ea605e05ab68fd7f6f78c43301fa81121456e41fa58d39c017
Message ID: <365CAF45.27B97897@chisp.net>
Reply To: <199811252258.QAA31290@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-26 00:53:40 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:53:40 +0800

Raw message

From: "Douglas L. Peterson" <fnorky@chisp.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 08:53:40 +0800
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: Re: Article V - an analysis
In-Reply-To: <199811252258.QAA31290@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <365CAF45.27B97897@chisp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jim Choate wrote:
> 
>                                 ARTICLE V.
> 
>         [Constitution: how amended; proviso.]
[snip]

> The only sticky wicket I see is the ...proposed by Congress. Does this mean
> that Congress can decide which of the two it will recognize? Or does it mean
> that Congress can merely express its desire? Or does this apply only to the
> bills that were developed in the Congress? There's no time line for Congress
> to decide, could this be used to hinder such a process?

It seemed very clear to me that the "proposed by Congress" is refering
to any amendment proposed by Congress.

-Doug





Thread