1998-11-05 - RE: Quick, Dear – Beat Me

Header Data

From: “Blanc” <blancw@cnw.com>
To: <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Message Hash: 74fadab622a5107ad1c2cc0d04b615b55664a5a49ca1b82fdb72aac218e6c0ec
Message ID: <000401be087d$55f97aa0$3b8195cf@blanc>
Reply To: <199811041840.NAA00424@mail1.panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-05 05:48:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:48:25 +0800

Raw message

From: "Blanc" <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:48:25 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: RE: Quick, Dear -- Beat Me
In-Reply-To: <199811041840.NAA00424@mail1.panix.com>
Message-ID: <000401be087d$55f97aa0$3b8195cf@blanc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>From Duncan Frissell:

: Protection of "victims" won't work if the new number is
: reported to the Big Three credit reporting bureaus.
...................................................

I just went to the bank I do business with this week to open a new account.
They wanted my social security number, (which they actually already have on
record), and during a search on her handy database, the Customer Assistance
clerk informed me that there was another person in Florida using the same
number.

I don't presently have a credit card, so I'm not worried about losing any cash
at this time.    The clerk gave me a form to send to ChexSystems for a consumer
report and advice to notify the Social Security dept about it.   I don't really
want to discuss it with them.  Think it would be to my benefit to just leave it
alone?  <g> Probbly not.

   ..
Blanc





Thread