1998-11-08 - Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email…

Header Data

From: b!X <bix@geekforce.org>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: eea754f94569b4b8706f78822e1f0026d18138d52cde90b81729933d3ea462b8
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.981107182855.19710A-100000@millennium-cafe.com>
Reply To: <3646ba82.49389892@news>
UTC Datetime: 1998-11-08 02:48:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:48:30 +0800

Raw message

From: b!X <bix@geekforce.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:48:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email...
In-Reply-To: <3646ba82.49389892@news>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.981107182855.19710A-100000@millennium-cafe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sat, 7 Nov 1998 phelix@vallnet.com wrote:

> Is an anymous remailer needs to register, what will the implications be?

Ok, if there's been a URL posted explaining what the law says about
registration, I missed it.

Being an owner of a cybercafe, I imagine I should see what the law has to
say.

- b!X (Guerrilla Techno-fetishist @ GEEK Force)

Thread

• Return to November 1998

• Return to “Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>bman@ahh.ohh”
• Return to “b!X <bix@geekforce.org>”
• Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>”

• Return to “phelix@vallnet.com”

• 1998-11-07 (Sun, 8 Nov 1998 02:23:52 +0800) - A question about the new ISP ruling and email… - Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
  • 1998-11-07 (Sun, 8 Nov 1998 05:52:59 +0800) - Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email… - phelix@vallnet.com
    • 1998-11-08 (Sun, 8 Nov 1998 10:48:30 +0800) - Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email… - b!X <bix@geekforce.org>
  • 1998-11-08 (Sun, 8 Nov 1998 15:32:32 +0800) - Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email… - Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>bman@ahh.ohh