1998-12-08 - Re: The problem with ‘Gilmore’s RSAREF’ site…

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com
Message Hash: 4fcfbeadc7a498f4fc4483ce5e70819e732ae505d85c1ea1a1e7de5c7c08787f
Message ID: <199812081805.NAA19779@camel8.mindspring.com>
Reply To: <199812081450.IAA10578@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-08 19:47:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 03:47:41 +0800

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 03:47:41 +0800
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com
Subject: Re: The problem with 'Gilmore's RSAREF' site...
In-Reply-To: <199812081450.IAA10578@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <199812081805.NAA19779@camel8.mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Duncan Frissell  wrote:

>Save that the cowards have never busted anyone for crypto exports.  It's
>dead letter law.  They know they'd lose a criminal case against a civilian.

But isn't the punishment a fine rather than a bust. With the usual grabs
of income and possessions if you don't pau. And then being listed on the
dreaded "Entities Index," BXcommunicated.

Sure, you can take it to trial, and BXA reports on those at its Web site,
actually crows about them, the wins, that is. No losses are ever
posted, lacking a reporting system for those.

In any case, these pockets are bottomless, so mega-fines are just fine, the 
FUSG gonna be in really deep deficit denial if it forfeitures this blackhole.







Thread