1998-12-11 - Re: PGP Inc has gone to the dogs

Header Data

From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
To: Adam Back <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 51369aa5f1714d46cb416f43390e84b0555b8a82592a2f979bad3e3126e1e0da
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19981212031015.00a74d90@205.83.192.13>
Reply To: <199810180916.KAA24934@server.eternity.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-11 23:31:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 07:31:04 +0800

Raw message

From: Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 07:31:04 +0800
To: Adam Back <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: PGP Inc has gone to the dogs
In-Reply-To: <199810180916.KAA24934@server.eternity.org>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19981212031015.00a74d90@205.83.192.13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Cleaning out the dross, I found this.

What was "broken" in pgp50?

Reeza!


At 10:16 AM 10/18/98 +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>
>PGP Inc has taken leave of it's sense.  Masses of untrue claims on web
>pages (take a look at examples below), no RSA support, no unix
>versions (other than old broken pgp50).

Thread

• Return to December 1998

• Return to “Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@openpgp.net>”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1998-12-11 (Sat, 12 Dec 1998 07:31:04 +0800) - Re: PGP Inc has gone to the dogs - Reeza! <howree@cable.navy.mil>
    • 1998-12-12 (Sat, 12 Dec 1998 11:06:25 +0800) - Re: PGP Inc has gone to the dogs - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@openpgp.net>