jamesd@echeque.com (144 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: Sometines ya just gotta nuke em-and nuke em again

• 1996-02-04 (Sun, 4 Feb 1996 14:54:40 +0800) - Re: Sometines ya just gotta nuke em-and nuke em again - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em

• 1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 12:20:51 +0800) - Re: Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:12:09 +0800) - Re: Sometimes ya just gotta nuke em - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Re: Jim Bell - Murderous Terrorist

• 1996-02-05 (Tue, 6 Feb 1996 02:59:51 +0800) - Re: Jim Bell - Murderous Terrorist - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: attila sez

• 1996-02-06 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 00:17:40 +0800) - Re: attila sez - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong?

• 1996-02-07 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 00:43:46 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: [noise] the individual and the tribe

• 1996-02-07 (Thu, 8 Feb 1996 01:07:38 +0800) - Re: [noise] the individual and the tribe - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Encryption and Backups

• 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 01:00:59 +0800) - Re: Encryption and Backups - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act

• 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 15:48:04 +0800) - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 22:37:11 +0800) - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act - Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
    • 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:22:13 +0800) - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>

Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act

• 1996-02-09 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 01:14:09 +0800) - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: “Rights”

• 1996-02-11 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:11:17 +0800) - Re: “Rights” - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

• 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:54:26 +0800) - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

• 1996-02-13 (Tue, 13 Feb 1996 08:20:17 +0800) - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 17:29:27 +0800) - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu

Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96)

• 1996-02-14 (Tue, 13 Feb 96 21:44:25 PST) - Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96) - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-02-16 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 03:46:20 +0800) - Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96)

• 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 21:40:41 +0800) - Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96) - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-02-17 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 06:19:35 +0800) - Re: Spin Control Alert (LI Newsday, 2/12/96) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: The Internet Party

• 1996-02-15 (Thu, 15 Feb 1996 21:54:38 +0800) - Re: The Internet Party - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act

• 1996-02-16 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 01:56:57 +0800) - Re: Fair Credit Reporting Act and Privacy Act - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

• 1996-02-16 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 02:47:07 +0800) - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-02-16 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 07:41:16 +0800) - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>

Re: Using lasers to communicate

• 1996-02-17 (Sat, 17 Feb 1996 15:38:30 +0800) - Re: Using lasers to communicate - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

• 1996-02-18 (Sun, 18 Feb 1996 08:05:27 +0800) - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Optical repeaters

• 1996-02-20 (Wed, 21 Feb 1996 01:16:10 +0800) - Re: Optical repeaters - jamesd@echeque.com

Remember, RC4 is now PC1

• 1996-02-24 (Sun, 25 Feb 1996 07:36:36 +0800) - Remember, RC4 is now PC1 - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Numbers don’t lie…

• 1996-02-27 (Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:28:48 +0800) - Re: Numbers don’t lie… - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: “Physical Reality”

• 1996-02-28 (Wed, 28 Feb 1996 22:31:22 +0800) - Re: “Physical Reality” - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Problems with certificates.

• 1996-03-02 (Sat, 2 Mar 1996 17:32:12 +0800) - Re: Problems with certificates. - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Problems with certificates.

• 1996-03-03 (Sun, 3 Mar 1996 23:13:43 +0800) - Re: Problems with certificates. - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-02 (Sat, 2 Mar 1996 16:47:18 +0800) - Re: Problems with certificates. - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Truelly Random Numbers

• 1996-03-03 (Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:48:33 +0800) - Re: Truelly Random Numbers - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: News on RSA vs. Cylink Injunctions and Patents

• 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 07:46:27 +0800) - Re: News on RSA vs. Cylink Injunctions and Patents - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Petty Civil Disobedience

• 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:31:52 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 00:10:31 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
  • 1996-03-11 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:17:45 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: Another Motivation for the CDA (Federal Sentencing Guid

• 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:39:23 +0800) - Re: Another Motivation for the CDA (Federal Sentencing Guid - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Petty Civil Disobedience

• 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 01:35:35 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 01:54:15 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
  • 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:47:22 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>

Re: Petty Civil Disobedience

• 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 02:29:58 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: rhetorical trickery

• 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:03:00 +0800) - Re: rhetorical trickery - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-11 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:19:57 +0800) - Re: rhetorical trickery - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>

Re: Petty Civil Disobedience

• 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:18:32 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:24:59 +0800) - Re: Petty Civil Disobedience - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>

re: Video resolution

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:37:08 +0800) - re: Video resolution - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that’s a subject line)

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:05:36 +0800) - Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that’s a subject line) - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: A lengthy preliminary analysis of the Leahy bill.

• 1996-03-12 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 20:15:00 +0800) - Re: A lengthy preliminary analysis of the Leahy bill. - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-12 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 07:29:32 +0800) - Re: A lengthy preliminary analysis of the Leahy bill. - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: How’s that again?

• 1996-03-15 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:31:46 -0500) - Re: How’s that again? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

• 1996-03-15 (Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:35:19 +0800) - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCC-type Regulation of Cyberspace

• 1996-03-15 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:16:25 +0800) - Re: FCC-type Regulation of Cyberspace - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-16 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 08:15:09 +0800) - Re: FCC-type Regulation of Cyberspace - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: Tim’s friend’s mildly retarded son

• 1996-03-16 (Sat, 16 Mar 1996 19:14:21 +0800) - Re: Tim’s friend’s mildly retarded son - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites

• 1996-03-18 (Tue, 19 Mar 1996 03:21:10 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-19 (Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:35:20 +0800) - re: monsters et al - Charles Bell <quester@eskimo.com>

Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question

• 1996-03-19 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:43:25 +0800) - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-18 (Mon, 18 Mar 1996 16:30:19 +0800) - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    • 1996-03-19 (Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:46:33 +0800) - Re: M$ CryptoAPI Question - bglassle@kaiwan.com (Bob Glassley)

Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites

• 1996-03-19 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 04:49:06 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:37:32 +0800) - Re: Judge blocks French ISPs from connecting to revisionist sites - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

re: monsters et al

• 1996-03-20 (Wed, 20 Mar 1996 19:17:07 +0800) - re: monsters et al - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED!

• 1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 19:06:47 +0800) - Re: Keep the pressure! Cryptographers Against Cryptography EXPOSED! - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill

• 1996-03-21 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 04:30:51 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-22 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 20:23:33 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - dirsec <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-03-22 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 06:58:29 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>

Re: LET’S ROCK!!!!

• 1996-03-23 (Sun, 24 Mar 1996 05:13:19 +0800) - Re: LET’S ROCK!!!! - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 17:38:57 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS

• 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 17:19:16 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:21:21 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 20:06:47 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Bad news from Judge Richey

• 1996-03-27 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 20:07:12 +0800) - Re: Bad news from Judge Richey - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Let’s NOT “Raise their Awareness”

• 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:34:56 +0800) - Re: Let’s NOT “Raise their Awareness” - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: (X:x)e$ ‘s other use

• 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:35:46 +0800) - Re: (X:x)e$ ‘s other use - jamesd@echeque.com

How to enter the US without a visa?

• 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:36:19 +0800) - How to enter the US without a visa? - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 20:29:48 +0800) - Re: How to enter the US without a visa? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-29 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:59:00 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 11:07:44 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Edited Edupage, 24 March 1996

• 1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 15:11:47 +0800) - Re: Edited Edupage, 24 March 1996 - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.12 - Sen. Burns Announces New Bill To Lift Crypto Export Controls

• 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 07:20:56 +0800) - Re: CDT Policy Post 2.12 - Sen. Burns Announces New Bill To Lift Crypto Export Controls - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: New crypto bill to be introduced

• 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 07:51:01 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - jamesd@echeque.com

RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua

• 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 08:10:24 +0800) - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign langua - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:01:50 +0800) - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
    • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:40:52 +0800) - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
      • 1996-03-31 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 00:05:31 +0800) - RE: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)

Re: Question about integrity of Blind Signature

• 1996-04-01 (Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:45:23 +0800) - Re: Question about integrity of Blind Signature - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Chaumian ecash without RSA

• 1996-04-02 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 07:44:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Chaumian ecash without RSA - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 16:40:30 +0800) - Re: Chaumian ecash without RSA - “D.A. Wagner” <daw27@newton.cam.ac.uk>

Re: Chaumian ecash without RSA

• 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 19:49:26 +0800) - Re: Chaumian ecash without RSA - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-03 (Thu, 4 Apr 1996 00:11:27 +0800) - Re: Chaumian ecash without RSA - “D.A. Wagner” <daw27@newton.cam.ac.uk>

Re: software with “hooks” for crypto

• 1996-04-03 (Wed, 3 Apr 1996 19:50:58 +0800) - Re: software with “hooks” for crypto - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: RC4 improvement idea

• 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:50:10 +0800) - Re: RC4 improvement idea - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 23:19:56 +0800) - Re: RC4 improvement idea - daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 18:29:30 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-04-08 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 16:01:27 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work

• 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:12:03 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-09 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 02:16:53 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>
  • 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 19:43:11 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
  • 1996-04-10 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 03:39:40 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - Mike McNally <m5@vail.tivoli.com>

Re: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:39:18 +0800) - Re: questions about bits and bytes - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: why compression doesn’t perfectly even out entropy

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 23:45:00 +0800) - Re: why compression doesn’t perfectly even out entropy - jamesd@echeque.com

On computer face recognition:

• 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:49:40 +0800) - On computer face recognition: - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 13:57:36 +0800) - Re: On computer face recognition: - Alan Horowitz <alanh@mailhost.infi.net>
    • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 09:25:14 +0800) - Re: On computer face recognition: - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
    • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 21:37:24 +0800) - Re: On computer face recognition: - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>

Re: RC4 improvement idea

• 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 21:14:08 +0800) - Re: RC4 improvement idea - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 06:22:07 +0800) - Re: RC4 improvement idea - “D.A. Wagner” <daw27@newton.cam.ac.uk>

Re: Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues !

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 10:56:48 +0800) - Re: Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues ! - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 04:49:02 +0800) - Re: [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: 5th protect password? - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 05:11:06 +0800) - Re: [Yadda Yadda Yadda] Re: 5th protect password? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>

Re: Entropy

• 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 16:37:11 +0800) - Re: Entropy - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Nazis on the Net

• 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 17:10:36 +0800) - Re: Nazis on the Net - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 04:37:30 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:15:23 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

• 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 17:00:25 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 03:44:55 -0700 (PDT)) - [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - bryce@digicash.com

Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues

• 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”?

• 1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 19:07:00 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: code vs cypher

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:46:55 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 10:49:59 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: code vs cypher

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 14:42:35 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: code vs cypher

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 19:39:23 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:13:22 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
    • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 12:57:06 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: aufweidersehn, * grave$

• 1996-05-02 (Fri, 3 May 1996 07:06:44 +0800) - Re: aufweidersehn, * grave$ - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 17:29:28 +0800) - [Complete NOISE] Re: aufweidersehn, * grave$ - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-05-03 (Sat, 4 May 1996 07:57:31 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 18:21:27 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 22:27:33 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-05-04 (Sun, 5 May 1996 03:46:46 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    • 1996-05-05 (Sun, 5 May 1996 10:33:08 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1996-05-05 (Sun, 5 May 1996 12:34:14 +0800) - errata - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-05-05 (Sun, 5 May 1996 15:58:25 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-05 (Mon, 6 May 1996 05:17:45 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: Kid Gloves or Megaphones

• 1996-05-05 (Mon, 6 May 1996 06:25:02 +0800) - Re: Kid Gloves or Megaphones - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-08 (Wed, 8 May 1996 15:01:40 +0800) - ecash moneychangers (Was: Kid Gloves or Megaphones) - iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-05-05 (Mon, 6 May 1996 06:27:53 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes

• 1996-05-06 (Tue, 7 May 1996 04:33:40 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-07 (Tue, 7 May 1996 13:56:13 +0800) - Re: Why I Pay Too Much in Taxes - “Jon Leonard” <jleonard@divcom.umop-ap.com>

Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-13 (Mon, 13 May 1996 19:17:04 +0800) - Why does the state still stand: - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings

• 1996-05-14 (Tue, 14 May 1996 10:12:59 +0800) - Re: Mandatory Voluntary Self-Ratings - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: PRZ /PGP

• 1996-05-15 (Wed, 15 May 1996 12:23:15 +0800) - Re: PRZ /PGP - jamesd@echeque.com

RE: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 11:27:59 +0800) - RE: Why does the state still stand: - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 16:03:47 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - bryce@digicash.com
    • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 09:13:05 +0800) - marginal cost of ecash transaction - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
      • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 11:22:49 +0800) - Re: marginal cost of ecash transaction - bryce@digicash.com

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 15:34:22 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 14:17:26 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Re: Why does the state still stand:

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 16:02:35 +0800) - Re: Why does the state still stand: - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: crosspost re remailers

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 16:36:11 +0800) - Re: crosspost re remailers - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 12:12:03 +0800) - Re: crosspost re remailers - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: anonymous companies

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 02:19:00 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 21:55:34 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
  • 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 03:53:01 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: anonymous companies

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 06:46:31 +0800) - Re: anonymous companies - jamesd@echeque.com

‘Excommunication’

• 1996-05-20 (Mon, 20 May 1996 12:30:34 +0800) - ‘Excommunication’ - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:24:33 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:24:55 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: encrypted open books (Was why does the state still stand)

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 16:50:14 +0800) - Re: encrypted open books (Was why does the state still stand) - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: PROTOCOL: Encrypted Open Books

• 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 18:35:31 +0800) - Re: PROTOCOL: Encrypted Open Books - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…”

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 05:42:07 +0800) - Re: [SCARE]: “If you only knew what we know…” - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Children’s Privacy Act

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:15:03 +0800) - Re: Children’s Privacy Act - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM… (fwd)

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:36:13 +0800) - Re: PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM… (fwd) - jamesd@echeque.com

PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM…

• 1996-05-26 (Mon, 27 May 1996 06:46:01 +0800) - PILATE SAYETH UNTO HIM… - jamesd@echeque.com

Noise, was The Anti-Briefing…

• 1996-05-28 (Tue, 28 May 1996 10:59:28 +0800) - Noise, was The Anti-Briefing… - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing”

• 1996-06-02 (Sun, 2 Jun 1996 09:04:55 +0800) - Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-06-03 (Mon, 3 Jun 1996 11:55:42 +0800) - Re: WSJ on “IRS-bashing” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution

• 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 19:34:44 +0800) - Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution

• 1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 20:18:35 +0800) - Re: whitehouse web incident, viva la web revolution - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

• 1996-06-07 (Sat, 8 Jun 1996 05:41:33 +0800) - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?

• 1996-06-08 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 07:06:45 +0800) - Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - jamesd@echeque.com

NOISE: “Fascism is corporatism”

• 1996-06-08 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 07:17:48 +0800) - NOISE: “Fascism is corporatism” - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:49:29 +0800) - Re: NOISE: “Fascism is corporatism” - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Anonymous stock trades.

• 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 16:50:25 +0800) - Re: Anonymous stock trades. - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 17:51:41 +0800) - Re: Anonymous stock trades. - “W. Kinney” <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
  • 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 00:38:06 +0800) - Re: Anonymous stock trades. - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>

Re: Anonymous stock trades.

• 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:23:48 +0800) - Re: Anonymous stock trades. - jamesd@echeque.com

[NOISE] “Fascism is corporatism”

• 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:43:56 +0800) - [NOISE] “Fascism is corporatism” - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Anti-Scientologists

• 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 14:36:18 +0800) - Re: Anti-Scientologists - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Why PGP isn’t so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)

• 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:12:48 +0800) - Re: Why PGP isn’t so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss) - jamesd@echeque.com

[NOISE] “Fascism is corporatism”

• 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 19:31:30 +0800) - [NOISE] “Fascism is corporatism” - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Slander of Catholic Church

• 1996-06-12 (Wed, 12 Jun 1996 19:17:11 +0800) - Re: Slander of Catholic Church - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-06-12 (Thu, 13 Jun 1996 02:18:27 +0800) - Re: Slander of Catholic Church - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: [Slightly less Off-topic] Re: Insults (was: PBS show)

• 1996-06-16 (Sun, 16 Jun 1996 17:28:35 +0800) - Re: [Slightly less Off-topic] Re: Insults (was: PBS show) - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Does information want to be free?

• 1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:15:15 +0800) - Re: Does information want to be free? - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans

• 1996-06-25 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 06:16:42 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 17:31:17 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu
    • 1996-06-26 (Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:33:22 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
      • 1996-06-27 (Thu, 27 Jun 1996 12:50:43 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu
        • 1996-07-04 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 22:30:15 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
          • 1996-07-04 (Fri, 5 Jul 1996 02:54:25 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
          • 1996-07-06 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 08:05:24 +0800) - Re: Noise: Re: Those Evil Republicans - hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu

Re: RFD: Developing Nations and crypto (based on excertp from Edupag

• 1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 19:30:29 +0800) - Re: RFD: Developing Nations and crypto (based on excertp from Edupag - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping)

• 1996-06-29 (Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:20:15 +0800) - Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping) - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Hardware RNG

• 1996-07-01 (Tue, 2 Jul 1996 03:03:35 +0800) - Re: Hardware RNG - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: rsync and md4

• 1996-07-05 (Sat, 6 Jul 1996 06:21:18 +0800) - Re: rsync and md4 - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:Advocating Violence

• 1997-04-15 (Mon, 14 Apr 1997 22:16:04 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: FCPUNX:Advocating Violence - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:Passphrase entropy

• 1997-04-19 (Fri, 18 Apr 1997 23:43:18 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: FCPUNX:Passphrase entropy - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: Short AP Rant [POLITICAL NOISE]

• 1997-04-23 (Tue, 22 Apr 1997 22:07:46 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Short AP Rant [POLITICAL NOISE] - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:Layoffs at PGP

• 1997-05-03 (Sat, 3 May 1997 12:42:12 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:Layoffs at PGP - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:List of GAK supporters

• 1997-05-10 (Sat, 10 May 1997 12:23:40 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:List of GAK supporters - jamesd@echeque.com

unsafe SAFE:

• 1997-05-14 (Wed, 14 May 1997 12:30:55 +0800) - unsafe SAFE: - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1997-05-14 (Wed, 14 May 1997 13:49:33 +0800) - Re: unsafe SAFE: - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1997-05-14 (Wed, 14 May 1997 14:21:34 +0800) - Re: unsafe SAFE: - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-05-14 (Thu, 15 May 1997 00:29:33 +0800) - Re: unsafe SAFE: - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>

Re: FCPUNX:The USA is the world’s biggest terrorist state

• 1997-05-23 (Fri, 23 May 1997 15:11:56 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:The USA is the world’s biggest terrorist state - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh

• 1997-06-08 (Mon, 9 Jun 1997 02:15:42 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1997-06-09 (Mon, 9 Jun 1997 23:43:00 +0800) - Assassination Politics as revenge fantasy (Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh) - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1997-06-09 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 00:49:36 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics as revenge fantasy (Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh) - Alan <alano@teleport.com>
    • 1997-06-09 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 05:41:10 +0800) - Re: Assassination Politics as revenge fantasy (Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-06-10 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 19:09:33 +0800) - NoneRe: Assassination Politics as revenge fantasy (Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh) - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
      • 1997-06-10 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 00:43:58 +0800) - Re: None - Alan <alano@teleport.com>
      • 1997-06-10 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 01:13:09 +0800) - Macht frei or make fries? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-06-10 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 07:55:16 +0800) - Re: None - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
    • 1997-06-10 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 00:52:24 +0800) - Untraceable Contract Killings - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-06-11 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 08:54:38 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
      • 1997-06-11 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 08:57:11 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
        • 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 01:37:29 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-06-11 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:57:56 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
      • 1997-06-11 (Thu, 12 Jun 1997 01:04:19 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
        • 1997-06-11 (Thu, 12 Jun 1997 06:11:44 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    • 1997-06-10 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:49:26 +0800) - Re: Untraceable Contract Killings - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)

Re: FCPUNX:My War

• 1997-06-10 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 13:03:49 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:My War - jamesd@echeque.com
  • 1997-06-10 (Tue, 10 Jun 1997 13:17:23 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:My War - se7en <se7en@dis.org>

Re: FCPUNX:Response to ‘My War’

• 1997-06-11 (Wed, 11 Jun 1997 23:51:03 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:Response to ‘My War’ - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly

• 1997-06-14 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 02:03:10 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:Flag Burning…

• 1997-06-14 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 02:03:29 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:Flag Burning… - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:Netscape Security Flaw is a Feature

• 1997-06-14 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 02:05:31 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:Netscape Security Flaw is a Feature - jamesd@echeque.com

Re: FCPUNX:Untraceable Contract Killings

• 1997-06-14 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 02:05:41 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:Untraceable Contract Killings - jamesd@echeque.com