Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com> (8 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: SSL challenge – broken !

• 1995-08-16 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 10:46:13 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-08-16 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:07:10 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
    • 1995-08-16 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:24:39 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>
    • 1995-08-16 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:33:43 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1995-08-16 (Wed, 16 Aug 95 13:40:23 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - “Harry S. Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>
      • 1995-08-17 (Thu, 17 Aug 95 08:39:23 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
    • 1995-08-17 (Thu, 17 Aug 95 10:05:32 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - pjm@ionia.engr.sgi.com (Patrick May)
  • 1995-08-17 (Thu, 17 Aug 95 01:26:37 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - Andy Brown <asb@nexor.co.uk>

is there…

• 1995-08-23 (Wed, 23 Aug 95 12:57:14 PDT) - is there… - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-08-23 (Wed, 23 Aug 95 13:12:06 PDT) - Remailer list pinging by e-mail - cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
  • 1995-08-23 (Wed, 23 Aug 95 13:35:03 PDT) - Re: is there… - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>

SSH random numbers

• 1995-10-02 (Mon, 2 Oct 95 12:28:10 PDT) - SSH random numbers - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>

PGP Comment feature weakens remailer securityPGP Comment feature weakens remailer security

• 1995-11-08 (Wed, 8 Nov 1995 13:21:55 +0800) - PGP Comment feature weakens remailer securityPGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
  • 1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:44:18 +0800) - Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
    • 1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 09:52:24 +0800) - Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>
    • 1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 10:44:36 +0800) - Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
      • 1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 22:34:33 +0800) - Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 02:20:49 +0800) - Small keysizes do make sense (was PGP Comment weakens…) - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
          • 1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 04:32:17 +0800) - Re: Small keysizes do make sense (was PGP Comment weakens…) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
            • 1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 06:03:59 +0800) - Re: Small keysizes do make sense (was PGP Comment weakens…) - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
          • 1995-11-10 (Sat, 11 Nov 1995 01:45:44 +0800) - Re: Small keysizes do make sense (was PGP Comment weakens…) - Andreas Bogk <andreas@artcom.de>
        • 1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 05:56:29 +0800) - Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
  • 1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:54:31 +0800) - Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security - NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>
  • 1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 22:15:26 +0800) - Mime/multipart (was Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security) - Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
    • 1995-11-09 (Fri, 10 Nov 1995 02:10:07 +0800) - Re: Mime/multipart (was Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security) - Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>

Re: Remailer in a box

• 1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 21:14:59 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
  • 1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 20:52:45 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>

Re: Remailer in a box

• 1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 21:21:16 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
  • 1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 21:30:07 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>
    • 1996-05-10 (Fri, 10 May 1996 21:26:23 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - sameer@c2.org

Re: Remailer in a box

• 1996-05-10 (Sat, 11 May 1996 02:33:29 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
  • 1996-05-10 (Sat, 11 May 1996 05:54:54 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - nelson@crynwr.com
  • 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 10:49:23 +0800) - Re: Remailer in a box - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>

Re: The Crisis with Remailers

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 08:29:47 +0800) - Re: The Crisis with Remailers - Lance Cottrell <loki@obscura.com>