patrick@Verity.COM (Patrick Horgan) (68 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: I need exportable crypto revisited.

Re: Linux brutessl client

Re: Cypherpunk Brute Squad [Re: SSL Challenge: Server problems]

Re: SSL trouble

Re: SSL trouble

Re: SSL trouble

Re: Sendmail Bugs

Re: SSL brute/ng

Is the book Network Security any good?

Re: Crypto ‘95: Robert Morris

Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam

No Subject

Re: PGP in UK - snooped as unSTEALTHed?

Re: Digital Fingerprinting

Re: Whitehouse “dissident” web site monitoring?

Re: Whitehouse “dissident” web site monitoring?

Re: Digital Fingerprinting

Re: NSA on GAK

Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.

Re: [NOISE] Alice’s Remailer site

Re: Caribbean Internet Services?

Re: netscape’s response

Re: MIME

Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape

Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape

Re: netscape bug

Re: netscape’s response (source code review)

Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape’s response)

Re: Seeds which depend on machine states

Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape

Executing code on the stack, was Re: netscape bug

Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)

Reformatted Weak Keys in RC4 for readability.

Re: Defense against a class of programming bugs

Re: Security Update news release

Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters

Looking for advice.

Time Lag (was Re: Yet Another “(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper”)

Re: Time Lag

Re: Netscape finally issuing md5sums/pgp signed binaries ? (was Re: NetScape’s dependence upon RSA down for the count!)

Re: subjective names and MITM

Re: Certificate proposal

Re: Graphic encryption

Re: subjective names and MITM

Re: Two bugs in CERN3.0 HTTPD

Re: Netscape 2.0 beta

Re: truth in advertising: Netscape 1.1 on security

Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce

Re: PKP Lawsuit progress report

Re: NYT on Internet Flaws

Re: Basic Flaws in Internet Security and Commerce

Re: NYT on Internet Flaws

Re: 90%

Re: Postscript in Netscape

Re: [NOISE] Re: Postscript in Netscape

Re: Postscript and 50 ways [MAJOR NOISE] [long]

The Dr. Fred scandal

Re: textbooks

Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?

Re: [reformatted] how secure can privasoft be?

Re: Netscape rewards are an insult

Re: Verification of Registration

MD5 concerns, was Re: Netscape Logic Bomb detailed by IETF

Re: textbooks

Re: textbooks

Re: Welcome to cypherpunks

I-D ACTION:draft-eastlake-cybercash-v08-01.txt