Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org> (28 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

OS2 IO driver for RNG-810 random number generator is released.

• 1994-02-11 (Thu, 10 Feb 94 17:50:25 PST) - OS2 IO driver for RNG-810 random number generator is released. - “Paul Elliott” <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

What is the CANNET/NEWBRIDGE RNG-810

• 1994-02-11 (Fri, 11 Feb 94 04:20:28 PST) - What is the CANNET/NEWBRIDGE RNG-810 - “Paul Elliott” <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

NEWBRIDGE RNG-810

• 1994-02-11 (Fri, 11 Feb 94 14:50:38 PST) - NEWBRIDGE RNG-810 - “Paul Elliott” <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

Question about the Clipper Chip

• 1994-03-14 (Sun, 13 Mar 94 17:13:51 PST) - Question about the Clipper Chip - “Paul Elliott” <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

Detweiler

• 1994-04-30 (Sat, 30 Apr 94 14:08:30 PDT) - Detweiler - “Paul Elliott” <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

Cypherpunks write articles

• 1994-06-05 (Sun, 5 Jun 94 11:46:48 PDT) - Cypherpunks write articles - “Paul Elliott” <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

How to legally circumvent the PGP 2.6 “legal kludge”!

• 1994-07-19 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 22:58:05 PDT) - How to legally circumvent the PGP 2.6 “legal kludge”! - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1994-07-19 (Mon, 18 Jul 94 23:54:40 PDT) - Re: How to legally circumvent the PGP 2.6 “legal kludge”! - certified *WiErDo* <yusuf921@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu>
  • 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 03:14:11 PDT) - Re: How to legally circumvent the PGP 2.6 “legal kludge”! - Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>

cryptosystems journal vol2 #2

• 1994-07-31 (Sun, 31 Jul 94 13:10:50 PDT) - cryptosystems journal vol2 #2 - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974?

• 1995-07-19 (Wed, 19 Jul 95 14:20:36 PDT) - Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1995-07-19 (Wed, 19 Jul 95 15:27:23 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - shabbir@panix.com
    • 1995-07-20 (Thu, 20 Jul 95 04:44:58 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>

Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974?

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-07-21 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 09:51:45 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
    • 1995-07-21 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 13:58:51 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
      • 1995-07-22 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 20:50:25 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
        • 1995-07-22 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 21:51:48 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - “Shabbir J. Safdar” <shabbir@panix.com>
          • 1995-07-24 (Mon, 24 Jul 95 11:15:58 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
      • 1995-07-23 (Sun, 23 Jul 95 14:21:46 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
    • 1995-07-21 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 15:05:11 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu (L. McCarthy)
    • 1995-07-21 (Fri, 21 Jul 95 15:05:27 PDT) - Re: Why no action alert, coalition opposing S. 974? - adwestro@ouray.cudenver.edu (Alan Westrope)

Re: A hole in PGP

• 1995-08-02 (Tue, 1 Aug 95 23:14:15 PDT) - Re: A hole in PGP - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

Cypher Rant II: Why Private Cryptography should not be regulated.

• 1995-09-08 (Fri, 8 Sep 95 05:50:40 PDT) - Cypher Rant II: Why Private Cryptography should not be regulated. - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1995-09-08 (Fri, 8 Sep 95 06:39:02 PDT) - Re: Cypher Rant II: Why Private Cryptography should not be regulated. - Michael Froomkin <mfroomki@umiami.ir.miami.edu>

GAK boycott, What are legal implications?

• 1995-12-21 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 14:08:38 PST) - GAK boycott, What are legal implications? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1995-12-22 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 17:21:39 PST) - Re: GAK boycott, What are legal implications? - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  • 1995-12-22 (Fri, 22 Dec 95 07:52:46 PST) - Re: GAK boycott, What are legal implications? - “Robert A. Jacoby” <rjacoby1@osf1.gmu.edu>

Hack Lotus?

• 1996-01-25 (Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:10:56 +0800) - Hack Lotus? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1996-01-26 (Fri, 26 Jan 1996 16:11:59 +0800) - Intl. Keysize Limit vs. U.S. Keysize Limit (Was: Re: Hack Lotus?) - futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)

Electronic Frontiers Houston Cyber-Political Questionaire.

• 1996-03-21 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 04:23:19 +0800) - Electronic Frontiers Houston Cyber-Political Questionaire. - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

MUSE (Mail Ubiquitous Security Extensions) discussion starting

• 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 02:03:58 +0800) - MUSE (Mail Ubiquitous Security Extensions) discussion starting - John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
  • 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 03:30:06 +0800) - Re: MUSE (Mail Ubiquitous Security Extensions) discussion starting - Ned Freed <NED@INNOSOFT.COM>
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 14:45:00 +0800) - Re: MUSE (Mail Ubiquitous Security Extensions) discussion starting - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 05:14:01 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - JonWienke@aol.com
  • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 08:24:57 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 20:01:55 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@Hrnowl.LoneStar.ORG>

Re: PGP MIME INTERNET DRAFT considered harmful.

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:05:27 +0800) - Re: PGP MIME INTERNET DRAFT considered harmful. - elkins@aero.org (Michael Elkins)
    • 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 15:02:01 +0800) - Re: PGP MIME INTERNET DRAFT considered harmful. - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
      • 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 17:54:35 +0800) - Re: PGP MIME INTERNET DRAFT considered harmful. - elkins@antares.aero.org (Michael Elkins)
        • 1996-05-24 (Fri, 24 May 1996 16:33:42 +0800) - Transfer encoding indpendant signatures. Was (considered harmful.) - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@Hrnowl.LoneStar.ORG>
      • 1996-05-23 (Thu, 23 May 1996 18:23:47 +0800) - Re: PGP MIME INTERNET DRAFT considered harmful. - schaefer@z-code.ncd.com (Barton E. Schaefer)

Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?

• 1996-07-11 (Thu, 11 Jul 1996 15:36:41 +0800) - Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1996-07-12 (Fri, 12 Jul 1996 09:54:10 +0800) - Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>

Re: ISPs’ information on users

• 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:10:54 +0800) - Re: ISPs’ information on users - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 18:09:37 +0800) - Re: ISPs’ information on users - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@Hrnowl.LoneStar.ORG>
  • 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 23:48:04 +0800) - Re: ISPs’ information on users - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
  • 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:44:32 +0800) - Re: ISPs’ information on users - Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
  • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 09:03:48 +0800) - Re: ISPs’ information on users - Stephen Humble <deeb@x.org>

How might new GAK be enforced?

• 1996-10-01 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 05:52:07 +0800) - How might new GAK be enforced? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-10-01 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 07:44:31 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
    • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:31:59 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:38:23 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Richard Coleman <coleman@math.gatech.edu>
    • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:46:29 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - “Peter D. Junger” <junger@pdj2-ra.F-REMOTE.CWRU.Edu>
      • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 11:45:21 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  • 1996-10-02 (Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:31:45 +0800) - Re: How might new GAK be enforced? - Omegaman <omegaman@bigeasy.com>

STUMP

• 1997-01-13 (Sun, 12 Jan 1997 17:31:46 -0800 (PST)) - STUMP - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
  • 1997-01-13 (Sun, 12 Jan 1997 20:23:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: STUMP - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: Numbers we cannot talk about

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-01-20 (Sun, 19 Jan 1997 16:45:02 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Numbers we cannot talk about - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
    • 1997-01-20 (Sun, 19 Jan 1997 18:38:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Numbers we cannot talk about - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
      • 1997-01-20 (Mon, 20 Jan 1997 01:46:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Numbers we cannot talk about - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@Hrnowl.LoneStar.ORG>

Re: Numbers we cannot talk about

• 1997-01-20 (Mon, 20 Jan 1997 08:12:07 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Numbers we cannot talk about - Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>