Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com> (71 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS

• 1996-03-25 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 11:15:35 +0800) - LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
  • 1996-03-25 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 14:37:53 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
    • 1996-03-25 (Mon, 25 Mar 1996 15:28:13 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
      • 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:16:00 +0800) - Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
        • 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 04:15:40 +0800) - So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
          • 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 05:43:27 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
            • 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 05:40:27 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’, shame) - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
            • 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 23:53:54 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
          • 1996-03-25 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 07:47:29 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
            • 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 08:42:36 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
              • 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 02:33:59 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
                • 1996-03-26 (Wed, 27 Mar 1996 02:40:20 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
                  • 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 14:00:15 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
                    • 1996-03-26 (Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:52:19 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , shame) - sameer@c2.org
          • 1996-03-27 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 01:13:39 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , , shame) - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
            • 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:44:45 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O’ , , shame) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

• 1996-03-28 (Thu, 28 Mar 1996 15:55:45 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - “Rich Burroughs” <richieb@teleport.com>

Re:

• 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 20:13:00 +0800) - Re: - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailerrecords?

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 22:54:41 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailerrecords? - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 19:41:47 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 06:17:06 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:24:51 +0800) - Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Watch your language, Shabbir.

• 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 17:37:35 +0800) - Re: Watch your language, Shabbir. - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

plaugue of unsubscribes

• 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 05:42:35 +0800) - plaugue of unsubscribes - Alex Strasheim <alex@crawfish.suba.com>
  • 1996-04-18 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 07:54:22 +0800) - Re: plaugue of unsubscribes - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 14:51:17 +0800) - Re: plaugue of unsubscribes - Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>

Re: EFF/Bernstein Press Release

• 1996-04-19 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 06:57:56 +0800) - Re: EFF/Bernstein Press Release - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: DANGER! Baby-Food Bombs on the Internet! [was Re: (Fwd)]

• 1996-04-19 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 07:35:38 +0800) - Re: DANGER! Baby-Food Bombs on the Internet! [was Re: (Fwd)] - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: E-mail harassment by c2

• 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:35:54 +0800) - Re: E-mail harassment by c2 - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:49:40 +0800) - [NOISE]Re: E-mail harassment by c2 - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
    • 1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:13:14 +0800) - Re: [NOISE]Re: E-mail harassment by c2 - Arley Carter <ac@hawk.twinds.com>

Re: OS/2 encryption

• 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 05:28:29 +0800) - Re: OS/2 encryption - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Anonymnity at teleport

• 1996-04-22 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 12:43:05 +0800) - Re: Anonymnity at teleport - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law

• 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 15:14:32 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

• 1996-04-23 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 03:38:18 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

• 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:18:32 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:25:51 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

CO$

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:44:17 +0800) - CO$ - SBinkley@atitech.ca (Scott Binkley)
    • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:39:39 +0800) - Re: CO$ - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues

• 1996-04-25 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 22:31:56 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

CFA: a million geeks?

• 1996-05-02 (Thu, 2 May 1996 16:43:13 +0800) - CFA: a million geeks? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: proposed anti-pseudospoofing law in Georgia

• 1996-05-03 (Fri, 3 May 1996 14:07:21 +0800) - Re: proposed anti-pseudospoofing law in Georgia - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Conrad_Burns@burns.senate.gov: Open Letter to Internet Community From Senator Burns

• 1996-05-04 (Sat, 4 May 1996 13:14:18 +0800) - Re: Conrad_Burns@burns.senate.gov: Open Letter to Internet Community From Senator Burns - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Justice Department looking for ISP’s

• 1996-05-04 (Sun, 5 May 1996 07:10:20 +0800) - Justice Department looking for ISP’s - nobody@ee.siue.edu (Anonymous)
  • 1996-05-05 (Sun, 5 May 1996 08:44:07 +0800) - Re: Justice Department looking for ISP’s - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down

• 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 11:36:37 +0800) - Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-05-11 (Sat, 11 May 1996 17:51:35 +0800) - Re: remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl down - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)

Re: [Yadda Yadda Heil Dave] Re: Rich is leaving for thetapunks

• 1996-05-12 (Sun, 12 May 1996 08:11:08 +0800) - Re: [Yadda Yadda Heil Dave] Re: Rich is leaving for thetapunks - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-16 (Thu, 16 May 1996 11:41:45 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 04:41:49 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
    • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 21:58:09 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  • 1996-05-17 (Sat, 18 May 1996 07:18:48 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 04:33:00 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 10:40:16 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman)
        • 1996-05-19 (Sun, 19 May 1996 15:42:30 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
  • 1996-05-18 (Sat, 18 May 1996 13:33:49 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 03:08:48 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-18 (Sun, 19 May 1996 04:11:42 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 10:46:49 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST

• 1996-05-21 (Tue, 21 May 1996 15:09:37 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns

• 1996-05-21 (Wed, 22 May 1996 07:17:42 +0800) - Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 08:33:43 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST (fwd)

• 1996-05-22 (Wed, 22 May 1996 08:42:56 +0800) - Re: SEVERE undercapacity, we need more remailer servers FAST (fwd) - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Another attack on alt.religion.scientology

• 1996-05-25 (Sat, 25 May 1996 15:22:01 +0800) - Another attack on alt.religion.scientology - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

[Fwd: –> CRISIS on USENET – SIGN THE PROTEST STATEMENT VIA E-MAIL]

• 1996-05-29 (Wed, 29 May 1996 10:21:06 +0800) - [Fwd: –> CRISIS on USENET – SIGN THE PROTEST STATEMENT VIA E-MAIL] - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?

• 1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 18:07:11 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 01:56:00 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
    • 1996-06-09 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 07:39:39 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass?

• 1996-06-10 (Mon, 10 Jun 1996 09:13:42 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] Re: RFD: Time to kick some anti-scientologist ass? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Anti-Scientologists

• 1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 09:52:16 +0800) - Re: Anti-Scientologists - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Snake Oil on the Water…

• 1996-06-17 (Mon, 17 Jun 1996 08:30:46 +0800) - Re: Snake Oil on the Water… - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-06-17 (Mon, 17 Jun 1996 14:41:02 +0800) - Re: Snake Oil on the Water… - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Snake Oil on the Water…

• 1996-06-17 (Mon, 17 Jun 1996 16:09:58 +0800) - Re: Snake Oil on the Water… - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Zimmerman/Viacrypt

• 1996-06-24 (Mon, 24 Jun 1996 08:09:35 +0800) - Re: Zimmerman/Viacrypt - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Length of passphrase beneficial?

• 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 03:35:40 +0800) - Length of passphrase beneficial? - Erle Greer <vagab0nd@sd.cybernex.net>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 04:44:05 +0800) - Re: Length of passphrase beneficial? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
    • 1996-07-22 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 18:14:37 +0800) - Re: Length of passphrase beneficial? - Paul Foley <paul@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 05:16:18 +0800) - Re: Length of passphrase beneficial? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-07-21 (Mon, 22 Jul 1996 05:53:17 +0800) - Re: Length of passphrase beneficial? - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>

Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight!

• 1996-08-08 (Thu, 8 Aug 1996 16:48:15 +0800) - Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-08-08 (Thu, 8 Aug 1996 18:17:41 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - Alan <alano@teleport.com>
  • 1996-08-08 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 00:01:51 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
    • 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 09:41:55 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
      • 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 16:49:02 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
        • 1996-08-09 (Fri, 9 Aug 1996 19:38:16 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
          • 1996-08-09 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 06:08:25 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
        • 1996-08-09 (Sat, 10 Aug 1996 04:03:21 +0800) - Re: Oregon License Plate Site in the News Tonight! - Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>

Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release

• 1996-09-23 (Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:51:34 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release

• 1996-09-23 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 05:43:49 +0800) - Re: Bernstein hearing: The Press Release - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!

• 1996-09-24 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 04:14:45 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-09-25 (Wed, 25 Sep 1996 14:51:57 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
    • 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 03:49:28 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
      • 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 07:33:29 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
        • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:31:05 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
          • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:21:30 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:53:28 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
  • 1996-09-26 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:18:34 +0800) - Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write! - Derek Bell <dbell@maths.tcd.ie>

Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!]

• 1996-09-25 (Thu, 26 Sep 1996 01:01:05 +0800) - Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he’ll write!] - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: NYT on IBM GAK

• 1996-10-02 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 02:10:17 +0800) - Re: NYT on IBM GAK - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: NYT on IBM GAK

• 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 17:31:50 +0800) - Re: NYT on IBM GAK - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 19:57:31 +0800) - Fighting Clipper III - Jim McCoy <mccoy@communities.com>
    • 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 01:29:18 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
      • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:16:00 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
    • 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 05:22:12 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
      • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 19:05:01 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
    • 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 05:36:22 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:47:31 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
        • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 12:19:46 +0800) - Re: “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
          • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 13:13:57 +0800) - Re: “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
          • 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 06:50:52 +0800) - MacGAK: Tim has a snit. Again. - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
      • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 15:27:55 +0800) - “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 23:37:19 +0800) - Re: “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 12:59:37 +0800) - Re: “Macintosh – the Surveillance System for the Rest of Us - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
    • 1996-10-03 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 07:23:04 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - Jim McCoy <mccoy@communities.com>
      • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 12:19:45 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
      • 1996-10-06 (Sun, 6 Oct 1996 17:44:51 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 11:25:34 +0800) - Re: Fighting Clipper III - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>
  • 1996-10-03 (Thu, 3 Oct 1996 22:39:51 +0800) - Re: NYT on IBM GAK - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 09:30:37 +0800) - boycott GAKkers (was Re: NYT on IBM GAK) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 12:07:44 +0800) - Re: boycott GAKkers (was Re: NYT on IBM GAK) - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
      • 1996-10-04 (Fri, 4 Oct 1996 22:18:28 +0800) - Re: boycott GAKkers (was Re: NYT on IBM GAK) - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Key recovery/RSA/Bidzos/WTF?!?

• 1996-10-04 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 03:31:10 +0800) - Re: Key recovery/RSA/Bidzos/WTF?!? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Dole web site cracked?

• 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 09:07:38 +0800) - Re: Dole web site cracked? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP?

• 1996-10-08 (Tue, 8 Oct 1996 09:08:12 +0800) - Re: Can somebody unsubscribe cyberpromo from CP? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Fuck Cyberpromo

• 1996-10-13 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 14:11:49 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Fuck Cyberpromo - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-10-14 (Sun, 13 Oct 1996 19:02:19 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Fuck Cyberpromo - roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
    • 1996-10-14 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 13:24:15 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Fuck Cyberpromo - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
      • 1996-10-15 (Mon, 14 Oct 1996 20:23:14 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Fuck Cyberpromo - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more

• 1996-11-02 (Sat, 2 Nov 1996 10:34:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-11-02 (Sat, 2 Nov 1996 15:54:19 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    • 1996-11-03 (Sat, 2 Nov 1996 16:51:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
  • 1996-11-03 (Sat, 2 Nov 1996 17:19:35 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis; John was right! - Ben Weiss <lazylion@idiom.com>

Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more

• 1996-11-03 (Sat, 2 Nov 1996 17:00:36 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Dr. Vulis is not on cypherpunks any more - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Telling quote from Bernstein hearing

• 1996-11-03 (Sun, 3 Nov 1996 12:11:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Telling quote from Bernstein hearing - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Telling quote from Bernstein hearing

• 1996-11-04 (Sun, 3 Nov 1996 19:35:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Telling quote from Bernstein hearing - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Does John Gilmore…

• 1996-11-16 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 10:01:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Does John Gilmore… - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1996-11-16 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 10:53:13 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Does John Gilmore… - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
  • 1996-11-16 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 15:21:34 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Does John Gilmore… - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

cause for alarm

• 1996-12-08 (Sat, 7 Dec 1996 23:37:58 -0800 (PST)) - cause for alarm - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: The virus I got…

• 1996-12-18 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:50:11 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The virus I got… - “Mark Rosen” <mrosen@peganet.com>
  • 1996-12-19 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 17:35:33 -0800 (PST)) - Eudora PGP Plugin - Tangent <tangent@alt255.com>
    • 1996-12-19 (Wed, 18 Dec 1996 18:08:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Eudora PGP Plugin - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

EFF: Bernstein court declares crypto restrictions unconstitutional

• 1996-12-19 (Thu, 19 Dec 1996 08:13:52 -0800 (PST)) - EFF: Bernstein court declares crypto restrictions unconstitutional - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

• 1997-01-05 (Sun, 5 Jan 1997 15:12:00 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

RE: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan

• 1997-01-06 (Sun, 5 Jan 1997 22:49:43 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experim

• 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 08:21:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experim - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan

• 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 08:28:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

RE: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan

• 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 15:10:26 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan - Robert Barnes <rbarnes@gil.com.au>
  • 1997-01-06 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 15:54:18 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
  • 1997-01-07 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 22:39:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>

PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5

• 1997-01-26 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 09:10:59 -0800 (PST)) - PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5 - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1997-01-26 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 11:21:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
    • 1997-01-26 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 13:32:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5 - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
  • 1997-01-26 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 12:32:57 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5 - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5

• 1997-01-26 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 15:26:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGPmail for Windows, Version 4.5 - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Ann: Encrypted disks for Windows NT (fwd)

• 1997-02-10 (Sun, 9 Feb 1997 21:48:12 -0800 (PST)) - Ann: Encrypted disks for Windows NT (fwd) - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Ann: Encrypted disks for Windows NT (fwd)

• 1997-02-11 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 06:26:27 -0800 (PST)) - Ann: Encrypted disks for Windows NT (fwd) - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: New group

• 1997-02-13 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:10:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New group - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re: New group

• 1997-02-13 (Wed, 12 Feb 1997 21:13:17 -0800 (PST)) - Re: New group - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re:

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 11:54:06 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>

Re:

• 1997-02-15 (Sat, 15 Feb 1997 13:56:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>