1993-09-18 - anon.penet.fi

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: eb8e8367f6486fdd411e8e6dd9e421252bdf497f2a86a4ad0be5af656a41261d
Message ID: <9309181636.AA21944@ah.com>
Reply To: <9309181302.AA09384@newton.apple.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-18 16:36:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 09:36:57 PDT

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 09:36:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: anon.penet.fi
In-Reply-To: <9309181302.AA09384@newton.apple.com>
Message-ID: <9309181636.AA21944@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Therefore, it seems reasonable that remailers should refuse to mail into
>penet, unless and until a non-anonymous reply to anonymous mail facility
>becomes available there.

There is already non-pseudonymizing reply available for pseudonymous
mail.  It periodically comes up on the list, and is periodically
corrected.  The irony of the situation is that the solution was
invented on this list a few months ago.

Solution: if you send to na12345@anon.penet.fi, then your mail won't
be pseudonymized; if you send to an12345@anon.penet.fi, then your mail
will be pseudonymized.

	an = anonymous
	na = not anonymous

Eric





Thread