1994-02-15 - Re: Detweiler abuse again

Header Data

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0153addf8a896f01c12d18c9a3807de4e3269f8430d34ffaf0029a9ba0d2d559
Message ID: <9402151942.AA17648@toad.com>
Reply To: <9402151758.AA22618@ah.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-15 19:59:37 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 11:59:37 PST

Raw message

From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 11:59:37 PST
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Detweiler abuse again
In-Reply-To: <9402151758.AA22618@ah.com>
Message-ID: <9402151942.AA17648@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

> But an community of isolated remailers could get larger than the
> cooperating set.

No problem -- just add them to the killfile.  Sure, new `rogue'
remailers could slip by, but so can any fool with a telnet 25.
Participating remailers would have some assurance that they're
not sending material from someone in the source killfile.  Non-
participators wouldn't, and could take the moral high-ground
all they like.

> Eric

   Eli   ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu