1994-07-01 - Re: Devil’s Advocate (again)

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: psmarie@cbis.com
Message Hash: b1acdecff70b3ade567faf333059dc2f6bcbecc9c4f241c308c0a9245c4b19b3
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9407011242.A17684-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <9407011852.AA28309@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-01 19:59:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 12:59:51 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 12:59:51 PDT
To: psmarie@cbis.com
Subject: Re: Devil's Advocate (again)
In-Reply-To: <9407011852.AA28309@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9407011242.A17684-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Let's keep our eyes on the prize.  Courts will do what courts will do.  
Maybe someone will shoot us up with sodium pentathal, maybe not.  The 
real point of Cypherpunks is that it's better to use strong crypto than 
weak crypto or no crypto at all.  Our use of crypto doesn't have to be 
totally bullet proof to be of value.  Let *them* worry about the 
technicalities while we make sure they have to work harder and pay more 
for our encrypted info than they would if it were in plaintext.

 S a n d y