1994-07-01 - Re: Devil’s Advocate (again)

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ba36aea30ef1585d5866b76aa4f75a1a653e34aff3fda6d9c1255570e92bb5c3
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9407010857.A2006-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <199407011249.FAA25594@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-01 15:38:22 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 08:38:22 PDT

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 08:38:22 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Devil's Advocate (again)
In-Reply-To: <199407011249.FAA25594@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9407010857.A2006-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 1 Jul 1994, Anonymous User wrote:

> . . . where in the Constitution does it say that people
> can have crypto not regulated by the Government?  Would this be
> under the First Amendment of free speech?

Try the 9th and 10th Amendments.

 S a n d y