1995-08-02 - Re: a hole in PGP

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: bc65a811bcdbbd84976eab91bcc45ff5894cce9ede66f7e02b3e438f7fe5fb42
Message ID: <9508020201.AA15198@cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <9508011212.AA17103@all.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-02 02:01:10 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 1 Aug 95 19:01:10 PDT

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 95 19:01:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: a hole in PGP
In-Reply-To: <9508011212.AA17103@all.net>
Message-ID: <9508020201.AA15198@cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Dr. Frederick B. Cohen writes:
> It's probably my fault for not asking them in the way you are used to
> hearing them, or maybe we are all over-sensitive about our work.

Since I've had no involvement in the writing of PGP and RFC 1750, I don't 
think I'm being sensitive about my work :]

> And if enough of those on this list feel that this discussion and my postings
> are too commercial or too abusive to take, I am certain that Brent will send
> you a free copy of his Fred filter.

Nah, we're not into third-party censorship here. As for myself, I intend to
keep reading what you write here. Your manner is not a legitimate reason to 
ignore the value of (some of) your words. 

-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>