1996-02-01 - Re: Lotus, NSA sing in same key

Header Data

From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
To: merriman@arn.net (David K. Merriman)
Message Hash: 8d19dc48c4ab487c036f7f759695da0857f76e17a92c306f12df75785612f19f
Message ID: <199601300655.RAA08590@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Reply To: <>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-01 17:16:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 01:16:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 01:16:30 +0800
To: merriman@arn.net (David K. Merriman)
Subject: Re: Lotus, NSA sing in same key
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-ID: <199601300655.RAA08590@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Hello cypherpunks@toad.com
  and "David K. Merriman" <merriman@arn.net>
DKM wrote [reformatted]:
> Article of that title in Jan 22 issue of EE Times:
> the encrypted data. Foreign hackers will find the encrypted messages as
> difficult to decrypt as a message with a 64-bit RSA key,
...                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>.
On sweeney, I may delete without reading!
PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two)
PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much)