1996-06-18 - Re: Remailer Operator Liability?

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Message Hash: a42f635e3748a3395f322b1a86a31ab3db15b0ee1d8f949a48d9235093801952
Message ID: <Pine.PCW.3.94.960617184654.7343B-100000@CISPPP>
Reply To: <>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-18 01:51:37 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 09:51:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 09:51:37 +0800
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Subject: Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-ID: <Pine.PCW.3.94.960617184654.7343B-100000@CISPPP>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

I've heard and used mail exploder before. Usually it's with the
connotations of a piece of software or equipment, rather than a list of
names - they're not synonyms.


On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Duncan Frissell wrote:

> At 08:43 AM 6/17/96 -0400, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
> >I believe we used the term "email exploder" instead of "mailing list,"
> >particularly in cross-examination and closing arguments, to convey the
> >idea that such a device is often used for conversation, not just one-way
> >communication.
> Was this term invented during the hearings or has anyone heard of it before?